“Attention to all our security forces in Kurdistan and Republic of Turkey! Get armed! All the Hizbul-Kontra -Hüda Par members will be executed at sight!” “Our Security Forces had started the armed conflict with the Hizbul-Kontra dogs at Amed. Today, we either die or annihilate these dogs for eternity.” After the paramilitary structure called YDG-H, who doesn’t hide the fact that they are in contact with PKK, had made this calling on the press, all the Hüda-Par members had been targeted one by
“Attention to all our security forces in Kurdistan and Republic of Turkey! Get armed! All the Hizbul-Kontra -Hüda Par members will be executed at sight!”
“Our Security Forces had started the armed conflict with the Hizbul-Kontra dogs at Amed. Today, we either die or annihilate these dogs for eternity.”
After the paramilitary structure called YDG-H, who doesn’t hide the fact that they are in contact with PKK, had made this calling on the press, all the Hüda-Par members had been targeted one by one. All the Hüda-Par related citizens’, whose addresses, work places and license plate numbers had all been identified beforehand, houses and workplaces had been burnt down simultaneously in Mardin and Diyarbakır.
You already know the worst. All the others had watched the first murder, which had been identified with the killing of 16-year-old Yasin Börü, by means of throwing him off the 3rd floor of a building and then bashing his head with a stone, and the brutal murder of four people. A total of 40 people had lost their lives.
Following the moderation call of the PKK leader Öcalan, the day after he had invited his base to look after the Resolution Process, a four-man group formed of PKK members had attacked the hydroelectric station at the Kağızman district of Kars. This was the sixth attack conducted on this station in the past couple of months.
Following the burning of two cars and the security guard’s hut of the station, the gendarmes had arrived at the scene. When they had returned the gendarmes’ “Surrender!” call with firing arms, a clash had started and while three of the PKK members had lost their lives, the remaining men of the 4-man group had ran away.
The following day, while two specialist sergeants and a private soldier, whom had worn their civil clothes and using their bazaar permit, were walking at the most central street of the Yüksekova district of Hakkari, they had been killed dastardly and cowardly by masked people, by means of shooting them from the back of their necks.
Also, yesterday, they found the corpse of Yakup Çelik, who had been the temporary village guard at the Çeltikli Village of Bitlis and had been lost for about two months. Çelik had been hanged on a telephone pole after he was executed, in order to “set an example”.
Since HDP had made a statement, which correlates the execution of three soldiers by means of being shot in the back of their necks and the deaths of three PKK members during a clash they had started at Kağızman, I guess we don’t need to discuss the perpetrator of the three soldiers in detail.
Even though the murderer of the village guard had not yet been identified, the ones, who know that the PKK’s aggressive attitude towards the guards/rangers hasn't softened during the Resolution Process, will not be surprised if PKK takes the responsibility of the murder in a short time.
Now we are listening to the “Will the state return to the ’90s?” litany since the October 6-7 Slaughter. The organization had returned to the ’90s. What will we do about that? First, they had conducted a civil war rehearsal in the region, but they failed. Now, there are people attempting to start a “low-intensity war” against the state. Besides, while their “cognates” are giving a survival struggle in Kobane, they are trying to carry out such a war against the state, which is the only country that had opened its doors to the Kobane public, the host of more than 200,000 Kurdish immigrants, and has by far more advanced reforms than Iran, which had executed PJAK members during the Kurdish incident!
Meanwhile, the PKK leader defines the Resolution legislation as a “historical turn” and during his latest meeting had called out for looking after the Resolution Process, leaving aside being related to the Kurdish rights. Who can claim that this strategy being conducted by one side of the organization is even “local”?
